May 11, 2003

Dammit, people

My blog, my rules. My blog, my rules. MY BLOG, MY GODDAMN RULES. Why can't you understand that?

Here, I'll try to make it easy for you. In your house, say you don't want anyone to smoke. You tell people: "I'm sorry, no smoking inside." The people don't like it? Tough shizzle. Friends don't treat friends like doormats -- and strangers don't treat strangers whose homes they have been invited into like ashtrays. One does, of course, make certain accomodations for people -- one does not hang visitors from meathooks or make them sing the theme from "Annie" while letting one's dog hump their leg, but otherwise it's the duty of the guest to behave. And if the guest ceases to behave the guest deserves to get his ass handed to him in a sack.

Here are some things I don't want to see on my blog. Their appearance will get your ass handed to you in a small paper sack:

  1. Any more comments referencing, favorably or unfavorably, the Country-Pop Trio Who Shall Not Be Named.
  2. Any reference to the 2000 "stolen" election. The last time I checked my calendar we were halfway through 2003. I am not responsible for your psychological inability to accept the passage of time.
  3. Any reference to anything the US does as being "all about the OIIILLLL." That includes saying, "But it is all about the oil --" and then listing umpteen thousand reasons to support your claim. Been there, done that, I'm over it.
  4. Any reference to how we "had no right to interfere" in Iraq or Afghanistan or wherever the hell. It's not only a little too late to piss and moan about that now; but I will simply redirect you to this article until you either get it or get tired.
  5. If, after reading the above article, you comment that the US "didn't really care about the Iraqi people, that wasn't the real reason for the invasion" yadda yadda, my reply to you will be: "Neither did you nor anyone else." Please note also that the shelf life of that argument is well past its expiration date.
  6. Comments telling me that I am "vicious," "mean," or that I should be "nicer" in order to "persuade" people to come across to my point of view. I am not interested in "persuading" anybody of anything. I use this blog to express my opinions on things, and if others are entertained, that is fine with me. If somehow some rant of mine causes someone to rethink a position of theirs, that's nice, but I am not responsible for how others conduct their own thought processes. I am also not particularly interested in "being nice." I already have friends. They know what I am like.
  7. People who ask snippily: "So what do you have a blog for anyway if it isn't to communicate?" Please see above, and remind yourself that "communication" doesn't always end happily. Consider it a life lesson.
  8. And last (for now): any "helpful" comments suggesting I am getting "too upset" over something -- trolls, politics, the weather -- even from people I like, will get an eyebrow-singeing reply from me. I really am not interested in changing the name of my blog even though it is obvious that it is not enough that my domain is called "Spleenville" to get across to people the sort of stuff they are likely to find herein.

There. I hope this was an aid to all visitors and potential commenters.

Posted by Andrea Harris at May 11, 2003 02:05 PM
Comments

I can get you a great deal on small paper sacks...

Posted by: McGehee at May 11, 2003 at 02:22 PM

Jeez Andrea, as the leader singer from the Dixie chicks says, "You know now it's all about oil". After all, we had no right to interfere in Afghanistan or Iraq, or wherever the hell and we obviously Bush doesn't care about the people -- didn't he steal the election? But shouldn't you be nicer -- isn't this blog anyway to communicate? But if I may add a helpful comment, ... (etc)

David

PS. Don't hurt me! :-)

Posted by: David Janes at May 11, 2003 at 03:41 PM

"People who ask snippily: "So what do you have a blog for anyway if it isn't to communicate?" Please see above, and remind yourself that "communication" doesn't always end happily. Consider it a life lesson."

Communication can be one-way, too. Newspapers are a form of communication, but that doesn't mean every idiot with an opinion can get their two cents in the New York Times. You own your blog, and if these dolts can't figure out to respect another person's property, that's their issue. I for one am glad you haven't apologized.

Posted by: Erica at May 11, 2003 at 03:43 PM

Hah hah, Mr. Janes, you think you're safe from my wrath all the way up there at the North Pole. Welllll, we shall see about that!

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 11, 2003 at 04:18 PM

Go Andrea! This is a good list. Also, I was thinking what Erica said; a blog is kind of like a newspaper.

Posted by: Jay Solo at May 11, 2003 at 04:20 PM

"Vicious"? "Mean"? Geez, you'd almost think those were bad things.

[checking eyebrows for oxidation]

Posted by: CGHill at May 11, 2003 at 05:57 PM

What's wrong with vicious or mean? Or Venomous for that matter?

Tap dance on your soapbox to your own beat, Andrea. And when the trolls stop by, tapdance on their heads.

Posted by: Venomous Kate at May 11, 2003 at 08:27 PM

You've left me no room to manuever, damn you! What a mean, vicious boxing-in. Welcome to Spleeeeeenville, mah pretties!

Posted by: Scott Chaffin at May 11, 2003 at 08:41 PM

I'm afraid a small paper sack won't be nearly enough for my ass, not that I would find myself in violation of any of your rules.

Posted by: charles austin at May 11, 2003 at 08:59 PM

geez andrea, i wasnt trying to be snippy at all, i thought i was being friendly. i certainly wasnt trying to criticize you. i apologize.

Posted by: mr. helpful at May 11, 2003 at 09:01 PM

I wasn't including you in the snippiness accusation, only the too-helpful one. It's others who have been snippy. They have been assigned number 7. You have been assigned number 8. Make sure you study -- there will be a quiz later!

(PS: Scott, some of your comments didn't show because the Santize plug-in removed the stuff in the pointy brackets -- it thought they were disallowed html tags. I get all my comments emailed to me and they come in original format, that's how I know. I'd re-add them -- edited -- to your comments but then I'd have to rebuild the entire site and so far total site rebuilds have been taking half an hour.)

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 11, 2003 at 09:10 PM

Feh...don't bother...it was hardly worth my time...much less yours.

Posted by: Scott Chaffin at May 12, 2003 at 01:56 AM

You're cute when you're angry.

Posted by: Phillip Harrington at May 12, 2003 at 09:43 AM

Keep trying, Phil.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 12, 2003 at 10:01 AM

Actually, anger is really unattractive, but I was just being silly.

Posted by: Phillip Harrington at May 12, 2003 at 10:19 AM

Oh, darn -- then I guess the date's off?

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 12, 2003 at 10:39 AM

I don't recall asking you out.

Posted by: Phillip Harrington at May 12, 2003 at 12:11 PM

If Phil isn't asking, I sure as hell am. It may be a fine line between love and terror, but I am willing to take the chance!

Posted by: John McCrarey at May 12, 2003 at 12:44 PM

Sharp as a bowling ball there, Phil!

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 12, 2003 at 02:00 PM

Go with God, John.

Posted by: Phillip Harrington at May 12, 2003 at 02:11 PM

Your rules for a blog are lame and I don't like the fact that you called my friend sharper than a bowling ball. Go join Cydcor and sell Quill office supplies!

Posted by: Matt Gray at May 12, 2003 at 07:20 PM

Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!

Posted by: Andrea Harris at May 12, 2003 at 07:34 PM

Please, Andrea, don't fart, in any direction!

Posted by: Phillip Harrington at May 12, 2003 at 08:08 PM