July 07, 2003

Military syntax

You know, I hate the word "blouse." I always have. As a person of the female gender I am supposed to refer to certain of my torso-covering garments as "blouses" but since I hate that word I never do. I have t-shirts and shirts but I don't have "blouses." (I don't care much for the word "top" either. It sounds like an adjective looking for a noun.) Anyway, chalk this up to Reason No. 4571 why I would never have made it in the military .

(Via Meryl Yourish.)

Posted by Andrea Harris at July 7, 2003 12:31 AM
Comments

I have always been under the impression that somehow a "blouse" was differentiated by a shirt because it's somehow poofier and looser and cut slightly differently.

I have also read about men wearing blouses in other cultures. Which, once again, never left me quite certain as to what the difference was, except I assumed it must be looser and poofier or something.

So, you know, women wear shirts or blouses, depending on what they feel like wearing. A shirt's a shirt and a blouse is a blouse.

Am I just all wrong here?

Posted by: Dean Esmay at July 7, 2003 at 06:00 AM

To further your confusion, there are TWO military useages of the word "blouse";

1) The "coat" of the Class A uniform [the one with the shiny buttons]

2) The act of stuffing your trousers into your boot-tops. This is normally done to the Battle dress Uniform [BDU], unless you are a paratrooper, in which case you can blouse the trousers of your class A green uniform [which when worn without its blouse, becomes the Class B uniform]

After 27 years it seems so simple . . .

Posted by: OldFan at July 7, 2003 at 07:16 AM

I have always thought of blouses as being more dressy - silky, lacy, ruffley, etc. And real men don't wear blouses. What the heck is the matter with the military anyway. I know they have a language all their own but "blouse"? SHEESH!

Posted by: Lynn S at July 7, 2003 at 09:59 AM

If you read 19th Century writings, they use the word for men and women's clothing. The usage for womens' clothing only seems to have started in the 20th Century.

Posted by: Dark Avenger at July 7, 2003 at 12:43 PM

And 'blouse' is Aus/NZ slang for either a) a woman, b) an effeminate man or c) a gay man. As in the question "What are ya - a shirt or a blouse?"

Posted by: Steven Chapman at July 7, 2003 at 06:39 PM

As someone who considers spice to be the obvious plural of spouse (based only on very limited experience), I also tend to use blice as the plural of blouse.

Posted by: triticale at July 8, 2003 at 03:52 PM

Don't women's blouses have the buttons on the opposite side of men's shirts?

Posted by: Val at July 8, 2003 at 06:56 PM

Val: all men's and women's clothes with buttons have them on opposite sides.

Posted by: David Jaroslav at July 10, 2003 at 10:47 PM