We'll see if this does the trick. At least it has a bigger backspace key. (Click for a larger pic.)
Posted by Andrea Harris at April 19, 2003 09:58 PMWowsers. That sure beats the crappy 10 buck keyboard that replaced my last nice one. It even beats the nice keyboard, which unfortunately wasn't up to having a bottle of wine spilled on it.
Posted by: mike at April 20, 2003 at 12:58 AM$24.99 at Compusa. (Plus tax, it was $26.something.) Not too bad. The keys aren't all crammed together, and the backspace key is nice and large, and the shift key doesn't stick. There's also all these buttons and things that do stuff, but mainly I grabbed it because the keys had the best "feel." Also it comes with a wristrest. ;)
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 20, 2003 at 01:02 AMwow..very nice..and its wireless, yes?
wireless is very cool.
i only have one requirement for a good keyboard and it isnt the number of shortcut keys present...its how well the keys respond when i type. they must be firm but not stiff, pliant but not squishy.
have you tried one of those "natural" keyboards? ive thought about it but cant bring myself to give up the ole tradional style...
Posted by: mr. helpful at April 20, 2003 at 01:06 AMNope, it's not wireless. I had no particular use for a wireless keyboard at this time, and they were more expensive anyway. I hate the natural keyboard. I can never find the keys on them, and that hump in the middle freaks me out.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 20, 2003 at 01:37 AMI'm reasonably satisfied with my $10 replacement keyboard from Wal-mart. I looked a couple of others but I picked this one not mainly for the price but because it had the fewest extra keys. It does have three that confuse me: Power, Sleep and Wake. Why can't someone just make a plain good quality keyboard?
Posted by: Lynn S at April 20, 2003 at 09:29 AMI had a keyboard like that. Those buttons never worked properly, and I finally broke the spacebar on it (long story). This one does have a lot of bells and whistles, but they do seem to work -- and it was the only one with nice big, widely-spaced keys that was under fifty bucks.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 20, 2003 at 01:03 PMAll the time. And the other keyboard has this weensy backspace key that was smaller than the regular letter ones -- it was like typing on a laptop. If I wanted to do that, I'd just get a laptop.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 20, 2003 at 10:26 PMFor double secret bonus points, make the transition from QWERTY to the Dvorak layout.
Posted by: Parker at April 21, 2003 at 03:08 PMNo way. It took me (mmmpphhh) years to finally learn QWERTY. I am too old to learn an entirely new keyboard layout. And lazy.
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 21, 2003 at 03:45 PMThe thing with natural keyboards is that they force you to type correctly. Before I got one I always used the wrong fingers for b/n/g/h/t/y. Now I don't, and I actually type about 10-15 WPM faster than I used to as a result, even when back on "normal" keyboards.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 21, 2003 at 05:08 PMOh I've used them, and all my friends who use them swear by them. But I also held out until the last minute on getting an answering machine, a cell phone, etc... I am running out of inventions to hold out against. A girl's gotta do something...
Posted by: Andrea Harris at April 21, 2003 at 07:01 PM