March 26, 2003

Fear of maps

A remark by Colby Cosh in this entry ("the famously geography-shy American public") reminded me of something that has bothered me for years: the idea that Americans have some sort of cultural block against knowing how to find out where other countries are on the map, and other evidence of xenophobia. It occurs to me that this is a meaningless slam that is based, apparently, on 1) childrens' geography test results -- I'll leave aside the reliability of a method of measuring cultural knowledge of an entire society based on how much its children know about things -- and 2) man-in-the-street interviews -- we know that interviewers, especially for television news outlets, never pick the most comically dumb people for their filler segments. [SARCASM OFF]

Anyway, to say Americans, who have provided the world with satellite imagery of the globe and Mapquest.com, where the travel section of most large chain bookstores have map sections bigger than the travel book sections (and where yes, you can get maps of other countries beside the fifty states), are congenitally afraid of geography is to show just how powerful the meme of "stupid Americans" is. Well, you all just keep telling yourself that. We might not have cared where Iraq was in relation to Illinois last year, but I can bet you even the common American man on the street knows where it is now.

Update: Colby Cosh replies! I have one question though, at the risk of sounding dumb -- what's "geographical imagination?" Also -- yeah, the editors and such went to university, where no doubt they had to "suffer" through at least one geography class -- or maybe not, it's not always a required course these days.

Now I am ready to concede that there is a "Geography sux" theme that runs through much American humor. But humor isn't always a perfect mirror to reality. And that's more of a subset of the School Sux humor genre, which is just a subset of the Hard, Boring Work Sux humor genre. And what's wrong with the example of Mapquest? I admit I just pulled that out of... the air, as I was trying to think of examples of the American map industry to show that people here not only have no problem with utilizing maps to get where they want to go, but that we have invented useful tools for doing so. (Of course Mapquest is just an online version of a fold-out roadmap, but it saves us a trip to the gas station.)

Anyway, I don't think that the reason the news media puts up lousy maps has to do with their fear that a detailed map will scare away viewers. I think it just has to do with the time factor, and the fact that to the professional media this fancy graphics stuff is still considered secondary to the talking heads and the live reporting. As for the lack of complaints about this, I can tell Mr. Cosh that his is not the first complaint I have come across. Mommabear, on On The Third Hand, rejoiced when she found a decent map; in fact, StrategyPage seems to be the map site of choice.

(P.S.: I didn't factor in the attitude of Canadians towards Americans re geometry -- I was following the time-hallowed tradition of ignoring general Canadian attitudes towards anything, and what do they need to know geography for anyway, there's nothing to look at up there but ice and snow and elk. Two! Two snarks in one! Oh, I'm going to hell.)

Posted by Andrea Harris at March 26, 2003 02:23 PM
Comments

I'm also nearly certain that I've seen similar "surveys" which show that European and Australian schoolchildren are not much better at locating other countries on a map. Hell, most people aren't intuitively good at using maps.

Posted by: Phil at March 26, 2003 at 03:07 PM

Once again, the "ignorance differential" raises its head (not my term, but one that I think is enormously useful): Americans ignorant about the world generally recognize their ignorance, while other people ignorant about America often nevertheless think they know everything. Canadians are particularly irksome about this. For example, I can remember giving something of an extended lesson on Canadian political history and constitutional law to...a tour guide at the Canadian Parliament. Isn't that even slightly embarassing?

Posted by: David Jaroslav at March 26, 2003 at 05:59 PM

Ands, that's the whole point. We have no interest in where anything is on the map unless

a.) we're going there on vacation or

b.) we're going to bomb the shit out of it.

Posted by: Kim du Toit at March 26, 2003 at 07:33 PM

Well, you know how those Canadians are. Them and the rest of Europe.

Posted by: Jim Treacher at March 26, 2003 at 08:09 PM

We don't have to know where it is - we have smart bombs to find it for us.

Posted by: will at March 26, 2003 at 09:20 PM

"War is God's way of teaching Americans geography"

No, I can't remember who said it.

Posted by: Ken Summers at March 26, 2003 at 11:34 PM

Well, I used to love looking at our old atlas when I was a kid. Maybe I'm a weirdo. (Okay, what do I mean maybe.)

Posted by: Andrea Harris at March 26, 2003 at 11:54 PM

The National Geographic Society, when they're not publishing cheesecake, likes to write hectoring press releases about how kids in most other countries are much better than Americans at finding things on maps. So there seems to be at least some measurable difference.

By accident I ended up with a fifth-grade teacher who liked to teach geography, so I ended up getting fascinated by the subject and learning a lot. But this was apparently an unusual occurrence.

Posted by: Matt McIrvin at March 27, 2003 at 12:47 AM

Amen. I was fuming about a similar thing the other day...reading some Time or Newsweek tripe about how Americans know so little about other cultures, languages, etc, because we are so "insular" and rarely travel to other countries. The fact is...we don't HAVE to travel outside of our borders: we have every culture right here! I love America.

Posted by: David at March 27, 2003 at 01:09 AM

Anecdotal, I realize, but my wife - a British citizen - has been asked by Americans in four separate instances where she learned to speak English so well. You'd think they were joking - they weren't - these idiots had no idea that the English speak, uh, English.

I could only hang my head in shame.

She's also been told she sounds Swedish, German, and French. Go figure.

Posted by: andy at March 27, 2003 at 01:44 AM

Um -- yes, anecdotal, there are dummies everywhere. What state were you in, what was the background of these people, what were their professions (if any), level of education (if known), and so on? And when you say your wife is "English," what do you mean? What part of England is she from? There isn't just one English accent. For instance, the accent in the North of England is markedly different from that of Oxford, or London, or Cornwall. And there are non-English languages spoken in Great Britain -- Gaelic and Welsh, and I believe there are a few speakers of Manx and Cornish left, unless those two languages died out. Anyway, if your wife has a British accent that isn't one of the more commonly heard ones on tv, then maybe they do think your wife is from some other country.

I wasn't claiming that all Americans are equally intelligent -- just that we aren't equally stupid either. And calling us "geography-shy" doesn't really make any sense -- it's like calling people "astronomy-shy." Geography is an interest, and the only people who really need to know it are geographers. It is good to know many things, but it really doesn't affect most people if they don't know what the capitol of Hungary is, or where the Carpathian Mountains are. I am more worried that people don't seem to know the things they need to know, because they are wasting their time on trivia in order to appear "well-rounded."

Arthur Conan Doyle seems to have been of the same mind. He made his character Sherlock Holmes perfectly indifferent to the matter of whether or not the sun went around the earth or vice-versa, much to Dr. Watson's horror.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at March 27, 2003 at 02:01 AM

I've updated my site with a non-apology, or perhaps a semi-apology.

Posted by: Colby Cosh at March 27, 2003 at 05:38 AM

I can assure you that most Europeans are completely clueless when we get a map of the US and are asked to indicate where whatever state is situated and what it's capitol is. Since you, contrary to Europe, manage to operate as a unity of all the states together, we simply don't need to know.
(this seems to be the best english i can manage...)

Posted by: Irrelevant European at March 27, 2003 at 08:14 AM

Andrea,

I'm fairly sure that the last native speakers of Manx and Cornish are dead, but quite recently: certainly within the last thirty years or so.

Irrelevant European,

Oh, but you do need to know, and just don't realize it precisely because Europeans are so ignorant about America. The fact is, with respect to many things, Brussels now has a far more direct hand in the internal affairs of EU members than Washington would ever dream of with respect to US states (EU "federalism" is not federalism but centralizing unitarism). They're not just lines on maps marking out administrative regions -- they're sovereigns, and the overwhelming majority of American governance is done at the state level (or below, but that's still a matter of state law).

Posted by: David Jaroslav at March 27, 2003 at 09:51 AM

Phil in the very first comment is right. A poll of New Zealand 12-year-olds showed that only about 30% were sure which hemisphere held NZ. One lad at least knew it was an island, but pointed to Iceland.

I could not find the Mauritians or Azores on a blank map, myself, and it would take a while to find NZ (northeast of Australia?), but it is not because of any bloomin' phobia. I havent solved a differential equation since High School either, and I liked math.

Posted by: John Anderson at March 27, 2003 at 05:17 PM

Southeast -- well kind of east-southeast I guess.

I admit it, I was a geography geek in school, and when the maps all started changing after 1989 I suffered a relapse.

Anybody wanna know the capital of Croatia? Huh? Anybody?

Posted by: Kevin McGehee at March 27, 2003 at 05:45 PM

Other people (Americans) have sent me that StrategyPage map. It's a good information source, owing to the frequent updates and the annotations. But it barely even qualifies as a map--hello, I can't see the Tigris or the Euphrates behind the planet-sized unit designations. The actual map part, behind the symbols, might as well not even be there. Although he's left out the sideshow in the north, CF Sgt. Bruce Rolston is doing a vastly better job of mapping qua mapping, despite having a day job.

Posted by: Colby Cosh at March 27, 2003 at 09:23 PM

Heh. When I was in sixth grade, in Canada, we were asked what the capitol of Canada was. Montreal and Toronto were the popular answers, there were even a few Vancouvers. The one who said Ottawa? Me! The dumb American of the class :)

Posted by: Ith at March 27, 2003 at 09:23 PM

That's "capital", with an "a", Ith.

Posted by: Colby Cosh at March 27, 2003 at 09:26 PM

The confusion comes from the fact that we have a "Capitol Building" in Washington D.C., which is the capital of the US. I've found myself making that mistake all the time, even though I am otherwise perfect.

PS: Rolston's map is another one I've seen recommended. Me? I like those old-fashioned ones on -- what's that stuff called... oh yeah, paper. It's easier to put stick pins in a paper map; all the pins do to up my monitor screen is scratch it up. ;)

Posted by: Andrea Harris at March 27, 2003 at 10:06 PM