January 03, 2003

The Old Hobbit and the Sea

Strangest Lord of the Rings nitpick ever: Jim Henley wonders why the sea isn't featured more in the tale. (Original question here; or you can start at the previous link and scroll downwards.) All I can say is: the sea and boats do not figure much in this particular set of Middle Earth goings-on because the sea and boats don't figure much in this particular set of Middle Earth goings-on. The story has nothing to do with the fact that England IRL is an island and was often (though not always) a seafaring power. I do think that there is a slight misreading of Tolkien's "intentions of creating a mythology for England" going on here. For one thing, Tolkien was not really trying to do this: trying to pass off his fictional characters and countryside as actual native mythology, rather he was using the tools and trappings of myth to create an imaginative story such as those he liked to read, and he filled it with all sorts of English things and motifs, as well as frank anachronisms from his own life such as "pipe-weed" (tobacco, a plant unknown in the real Middle Ages of the actual England), because he was English and he liked those things. Of course, that's a simplistic reading of Tolkien's motives and intentions, but I do think that people are taking the "he was creating a mythology!" and are running with it off into some strange places.

That being said, the lack of sea and boat travel (except for the takeover and subsequent sail upriver to beseiged Minas Tirith of the the black ship of the Corsairs that Aragorn undertakes in the Return of the King, and of course the boat ride down the Anduin), in the story is because most of the story takes place very far inland in Tolkien's world, in places nowhere near the ocean or any large bodies of water. In any case, as someone has already pointed out to him, the sea is a constant background theme in the story, with the Elves leaving Middle Earth and sailing to Valinor, the background of the Atlantis-like Numenor for the tales, and so on. Someone also wrote with an idea that since Tolkien was a "modern" Brit he had a "modern" concept of distance and travel, and thus was used to being able to get around without bothering with boats, but that won't wash either. Tolkien was very firm about the medievalish setting of the story: people in the Middle Ages rarely traveled far from their native towns and villages, and so it is the case with the average inhabitant of Tolkien's imaginary world. Furthermore, most of the countryside outside of the landlocked Shire is at the time of the story mostly desolate and unpopulated except for a few isolated communities, and there are only a couple of roads. Thus travelling anywhere outside one's community a dangerous undertaking that only someone who was rather cracked would do voluntarily (like Bilbo), or at absolute necessity (like Frodo carrying the ring out of the Shire). Also, unlike the real England, the story takes place on a continent. And lastly, the characters are heading towards Mordor, which is not only landlocked but has no contact with the shore, and no rivers flowing into it, and it is a desert.

Posted by Andrea Harris at January 3, 2003 05:20 AM
Comments

Perhaps a review of Tolkien's life will show that he really didn't care much for the sea and had little to do with it. People tend to write about what they know and like, even when they're making it all up. They also tend to avoid writing about things they don't really care for or know little about. Not that that has ever stopped me, you undertsand.

Posted by: Chip Haynes at January 3, 2003 at 08:40 AM

I meant to tell you that your pic of Frodo makes him look like "Frodo Bobbit -- Amputee".

Tolkien was born in Bloemfontein, S. Africa, which is about as far from the sea as you can get (500-odd miles in any direction, if memory serves), and there are no major rivers or lakes in the area either (think: W. Texas for an approximation).

Posted by: Kim du Toit at January 3, 2003 at 09:11 AM

black ships of the Corsairs? Dang! Thanks for ruining the next movie!

/pseudostupidity

Posted by: billhedrick at January 3, 2003 at 09:30 AM

Actually, doesn't Mordor have a "sad" inland sea, off to the east?

Regardless, well-said. I will be curious to see how Legolas encountering the sea, and the departure from the Grey Havens, is addressed in RotK.

Posted by: *** Dave at January 3, 2003 at 11:25 AM

I don't think that Tolkien disliked the sea -- he featured it in his other stories.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 3, 2003 at 12:02 PM

The sea is most important in the story, it's literally the edge of the world. To go to the sea is to leave the earth in Lord of the Rings.

From a more utilitarian point of view, there is, as far as we know, nowhere to go by sea in middle earth. No other continents are known, and the people of middle earth tend to assume there are no other continents, so there is no reason to travel by sea, except to get to valinor, which only the elves can do.

Posted by: Sean Kirby at January 3, 2003 at 03:41 PM

Sean,

Largely valid points, save that presumably at least some people in Gondor were still aware of the "new lands" to the west that were found by Men looking for Valinor after the shape of Arda was changed.

Posted by: David Jaroslav at January 5, 2003 at 12:38 AM

Tolkien makes Middle Earth seem bigger than it is in a number of 'artificial' ways. Excluding sea travel is just one of them.

Gandalf can run off to Isengard to consult with Saruman whenever he likes, and Saruman can import pipe-weed, but when the company travels south it is portrayed as a journey into forgotten lands known only in legend.

Tolkien loved to take walking tours, by the way, and was intimately familiar with English place-names and local pronunciations and other linguistic clues to the past. These become the delights of foot-travel across Middle Earth, where hints of past ages are often seen.

Posted by: John Weidner at January 5, 2003 at 04:42 PM

Well, actually, the foreshortening of the Gandalf-to-Isengard trip is the movie's doing; in the book a period of years passes between the leaving of the ring to Frodo and the return of Gandalf to tell him what he found out about it, during which Gandalf went all over the place; and the last time he goes off to see Saruman (and gets imprisoned) is also supposed to take some weeks or months. Tolkien was very picky about the distances in his imaginary world. How do I know? I've got the original sources (once removed, anyway): The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien, edited by Humphrey Carter. You should see what he says to an early screenwriter who wanted to have Aragorn and the hobbits be able to "see" Rivendell from Weathertop.

Posted by: Andrea Harris at January 5, 2003 at 04:56 PM